deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
Download Image
JPG, 1600×997
more ▶

More from *LPDisney

Featured in Groups:

Details

July 6, 2010
407 KB
1600×997
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 520
Favourites: 2,373 [who?]

Views: 66,053 (4 today)
Downloads: 1,019 (0 today)
[x]
:iconlpdisney:
(Created 07.10)
To see the Process go to: [link]

------
Why oh why????

I've decided to try and capture the idea what if Disney’s “Tangled” (a horrible name I must say, what was wrong with Rapunzel??? *Edit - Yes, I know why it was changed, this was a rhetorical question) were to be animated in the good old Traditional 2D Animation.
I took what I could find - at the time I posted this drawing this was the only production still available online. I also didn't find anyone else who did this at the time, so I gave it a shot.
I tried (with little success) to capture the style of Glen Keane (specifically from The Little Mermaid, cause Rapunzel is soooo Ariel), though I don't think I'm even worthy of writing his name here, less I am to draw in his style.
I took the background from the original production still. I'm not a background artist. If anyone wants to draw a collab background for this, send me a note (but no offense - you need to be at a Disney level, this need to look like a real frame from the movie).
Yes, I used reference. This was done to prove a point (maybe I'm the only one who is annoyed by this...)


I must share with you my feelings toward this movie, and I apologize if I’m blowing some steam here, you really don’t have to agree with me, that’s just how I feel:
This could have been such an AMAZING 2D movie! Good old fairytale and directed by THE one and only - Glen Keane. Just think about it - an ENTIRE movie in the style of Glen Keane!
And the hair!!!!!! The longest hair ever made in a 2D movie!!! (For those of you who know me, I have a fetish for long hair) Just imagine how it could move!!!!!! Like Ariel? Like Pocahontas? AH!!!!

BUT NO!!!!!!!! They HAD to make it 3D! (Eyes narrowed with a lot of sarcasm) Yes, 3D is the next thing... right...
Bluah! All the Art is lost! The style of the lines is gone! It just looks like a regular, a drop in the sea, 3D movie....

I had to go and fix some stuff, like the position of the neck and the feet. WHY DO I NEED TO FIX IT?????? It's a freaking 3D! And Yes, I had to fix stuff, they were just WRONG! I have to say I hate her feet, from what I saw so far in the trailer something with her feet is just not right. And what's with all the pink??? She looks like they took Ariel and turned her into Barbie! (hmm.. I have one of those... or 4...). Even Kida had red lines in her all blue outfit!

Yes.... I'm still going to see it with those 3D glasses or whatever.... It's Disney's after all :-)


All in all I believe it turned out nice. I’m pleased.
I uploading quite a high res file for you to use as wallpaper and such. Do not use this in your art or something like that, unless you got an approval from me, k?
I'm guessing when there will be more details (and shots) from the movie I will do more fanart. At this point I need more details on the plot to get inspired.

Oh! And Flynn… I hope I got your nose right :-)

--------

*EDIT: OMG! Just look at the first ones: [link] I just now found them!! Why? T_T *sob* Why Disney? The drawings are so beautiful!

*EDIT 2: I truly respect each and everyone's opinion. I just wish to point out a couple of things:
1 - Before the movie was released all the comments were pro 2D and now, after the movie was released, suddenly everyone is pro 3D... Yes, I saw the movie, I still think if it were 2D it would be remembered 20 years from now, but sadly I'm sure this movie won't last for a couple of years.
2 - Please read this: [link] If my words aren't enough, then I guess you have to hear it from Glen Keane himself, and I quote: "the computer is like a used car salesman. It’ll always make you walk off the lot with something you don’t want".
So... ya...

--------
About 5-6 hours.
Disney Soundtracks
I LOVE PS CS5!!!!! Content Aware Rules!!!
HAAAAAAIIIIIIRRRRRR!!!!!! Daisuki! Love to draw it! Love to move it! Love to smell it! (yes, I'm weird)

Follow My Work:
Online Portfolio / Lady Ice Official Website / Facebook / LinedIn / YouTube Channel / Commission Info / Stock Images
Add a Comment:
 
:iconflyingfreefantasy:
First off, I would like to add some of my own comments on this issue.

I bought Tangled on DVD a little while ago, and when I watched it, I was amazed. I watched it about 1000 times more, and I loved it. 3D isn't ALL that bad, though I agree, that Disney should stick to 2D. If Tangled was in 2D, it could have had many, many more amazing effects in place. Her hair, for example, could have been more flowing (like Ariel, or Pocahontas). As well as her dress, and other clothing in the movie.
But I will also point out that the 3D gave a more realistic look to Flynn's clothes (like his vest, where it ACTUALLY looked like leather). It also made things look more fun, and flowing. But that's my personal opinion.

About the picture? Well I think its amazing! Your art style is so old Disney, and what Disney needs again. The coloring, and shading style matches that of The Little Mermaid, or Mulan. And the way you drew her hair is... flowing. Just like Disney should be. But there is one little thing that bothers me about this picture. If perhaps you did the background in the 2D style as well, it would "paint a better picture" towards the message you were trying to get across. Leaving the 3D background just clashes, and makes it hard to judge which is better; the 2D or the 3D? (If you get what I'm saying... I really don't know how to explain it better).

Anyhow, great job on the whole thing, and thank you for getting your opinion out there! Very few people stand up for what they believe, even with movies, and art :)
What do you think?
The Artist thought this was FAIR
8 out of 10 deviants thought this was fair.

:iconkirosu:
I agree 100%. What was wrong with Repunzel...its been heard of. What was wrong with the frog prince? Things in Disney's eyes always need to be changed. To us out here it is confusing. But when ever it comes to the truth, things need to change for it to keep our interest as viewers. If it was the same old same old it wouldn't be fun to watch or buy or pay 8.00-12 bucks for the theater.

Now for the picture! Your picture is the way I would have loved to have seen it, it looks beautiful. The colour palette you used was almost if not exactly the same as the Disney artist would have used. I really love the way you drew it. I would kill to draw the Disney style right! Great job!
What do you think?
The Artist thought this was FAIR
75 out of 95 deviants thought this was fair.

The Artist has requested Critique on this Artwork

Please sign up or login to post a critique.

love 18 18 joy 8 8 wow 2 2 mad 2 2 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconsidetrack1:
Nice enough "what could've been" that I'll actually fave a Disney princess thing.Flynn is totally a few details away from Aladin.
Reply
:iconjontyroberts:
*JontyRoberts Mar 6, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I agree with your opinion because Disney has no reason to be using CG animation. It's a common misconception that people will tend to mistake the fact that CG animation isn't an upgrade to traditional 2D animation, it's an upgrade to traditional stop-motion animation; basically CG animation is stop-motion animation with computer generated puppetry. What is an upgrade to traditional 2D animation is Flash animation; which is computer generated 2D animation. Why Disney feels the need to adopt CG animation when Pixar (and other CO.) has it under control is beyond me.

I've argued many times that Disney has been in the "business" for a long time now and "money" has been the leading priority instead of the faithful "Disney" tradition the company stood for since the early 1940's. I mean Disney has bought out Pixar, Marvel, and Star Wars, and if that doesn't have CORRUPT written all over it, then I don't know what does.

Even though it's pointless to fight for what Tangled should have been it's still an on going battle for what Disney SHOULD be, which is strictly a 2D animation/Or with live action studio.

You did a wonder representation of what should have been. Kudos to you.
Reply
:iconobsidianvelvet:
I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOU!!!
Reply
:iconjesteppi:
~Jesteppi Jan 25, 2013  Student Filmographer
This is a wonderful experiment; but I truly believe 3D was an excellent choice for the movie. Though it is true that they lose line-quality, I believe they gained an extraordinary glow... Those lanterns would not have been half as beautiful if they were drawn in 2D. Also, the depth-of-vision is something the animators were able to really push, which would have been more difficult in 2D; for example, the extreme face close-ups. They would have seemed flat in traditional cell animation... I do like your idea of challenging Disney's decision, though. (:
Reply
:iconheroanakin:
Awesome drawing she look so hot and amazing. i hope they use this in a tangled animated.
Reply
:icongib31:
~gib31 Dec 2, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Tangled is actually my favorite movie. But if it had been in 2D it would have been even better... The landscapes, the characters, everything... *Sigh*
Reply
:icondubina:
את חרוצה כל הכבוד... , אני באמת לא מבין למה את לא נוסעת לעשות התמחות באולפנים שלהם ...
Reply
:iconclosetothewaterisee:
Mood: dA Love ~CloseToTheWaterISee Nov 24, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
A nice little masterpiece to add to the old Disney magic. In all honesty, not too much of Disney's stuff is drawn traditionally anymore. Always relying on computers now and days to do the work for them. If only it had been animated in 2D... Nevertheless, even in 3D, this movie was superb!
Reply
:iconstrandsofmelody:
~StrandsOfMelody Oct 27, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Well, this is definately an interesting idea. But 3D is still better. Especially with all that golden hair. 2D can't begin to describe nor show the detail of it. But I agree that Disney needs more 2D. 3D just seems to be a fad that's going on in the animation world. Hopefully, more of Disneys movies go back to the traditional 2D.
Reply
:iconnagoshiashumari:
~NagoshiAshumari Oct 19, 2012  Student Digital Artist
I think it was ambitious of them to try it in 3D :\
You never know what works if you don't try it.
Reply
Add a Comment: